Unlawful Assembly and Rioting (Offence)

Offences relating to unlawful assembly and rioting are found in Part II of the Criminal Code relating to "Offences Against Public Order".

Offence
Section
Offence
Type
Crown Election Defence Election
s. 536(2)
Preliminary Inquiry
s. 65 [rioting],
s. 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation]
s. 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot]
Indictable Offence(s) N/A (under 14 years max)
s. 66(1) [punishment for unlawful assembly] Summary Offence(s) (under 14 years max)
s. 66(2) [Concealment of identity during unlawful assembly] Hybrid Offence(s) (under 14 years max)

Offences under s. 65 [rioting], 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation], and 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot] are straight indictable. There is a Defence election of Court under s. 536(2).

Offences under s. 66 are straight summary conviction offence. The trial must be held in provincial court.

Offence(s) Appearance Notice
by Peace Officer
s. 497
Summons
by Judge or Justice
s. 508(1), 512(1), or 788
Release by
Peace Officer
on Undertaking
s. 498, 499, and 501
Release By
a Judge or Justice
on a Release Order
s. 515 to 519
Direct to Attend
for Fingerprints, etc.
Identification of Criminals Act
s. 2 ID Crim. Act
s. 65 [rioting] and 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot]
s. 66(1) [punishment for unlawful assembly] and
s. 66(2) [Concealment of identity during unlawful assembly]
(summary offence)
s. 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation]

When charged under s. 65 [rioting], 66 or 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot] , the accused can be given an appearance notice without arrest under s. 497 or a summons. If arrested, he can be released by the arresting officer under s. 498 or 499 on an undertaking with or without conditions. He can also be released by a justice under s. 515.

When charged under s. 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation], the accused can be given a judicial summons without arrest. If arrested, he can be released by the arresting officer under s. 498 or 499 on an undertaking with or without conditions. He can also be released by a justice under s. 515.

Reverse Onus Bail

If police decide to bring the accused before a Justice pursuant to s. 503, there will be a presumption against bail (i.e. a reverse onus) if the offence, prosecuted by indictment, was committed:

And, regardless of Crown election, if the offence alleged was one:

For all criminal or regulatory prosecutions, there is a discretionary general publication ban available on application of the Crown, victim or witness to prohibit the publishing of "any information that could identify the victim or witness" under s. 486.5(1) where it is "necessary" for the "proper administration of justice". Other available publication bans include prohibitions for publishing evidence or other information arising from a bail hearing (s. 517), preliminary inquiry (s. 539) or jury trial (s. 648). There is a mandatory publication ban in all youth prosecutions on information tending to identify young accused under s. 110 of the YCJA or young victims under s. 111 of the YCJA.

Offence(s) Wiretap
Eligible
s. 183
Dangerous Offender
Designated Offence
s. 752
Serious Personal
Injury Offence
s. 752
AG Consent Required Serious Criminality
Offence
s. 36 IRPA
s. 65 [rioting], 66 , 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot]
s. 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation] (varies)

See below in Ancillary Sentencing Orders for details on designations relating to sentencing orders.

Offence Wording

Unlawful assembly

63 (1) An unlawful assembly is an assembly of three or more persons who, with intent to carry out any common purpose, assemble in such a manner or so conduct themselves when they are assembled as to cause persons in the neighbourhood of the assembly to fear, on reasonable grounds, that they

(a) will disturb the peace tumultuously; or (b) will by that assembly needlessly and without reasonable cause provoke other persons to disturb the peace tumultuously. Lawful assembly becoming unlawful

(2) Persons who are lawfully assembled may become an unlawful assembly if they conduct themselves with a common purpose in a manner that would have made the assembly unlawful if they had assembled in that manner for that purpose.

Exception

(3) Persons are not unlawfully assembled by reason only that they are assembled to protect the dwelling-house of any one of them against persons who are threatening to break and enter it for the purpose of committing an indictable offence therein.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 64.

Note up: Riot

64. A riot is an unlawful assembly that has begun to disturb the peace tumultuously.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 65.

Note up: Punishment of rioter

65 (1) Every person who takes part in a riot is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. Concealment of identity

(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) [rioting] while wearing a mask or other disguise to conceal their identity without lawful excuse is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.


R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 65; 2013, c. 15, s. 2; 2019, c. 25, s. 10.
[annotation(s) added]

Note up: Punishment for unlawful assembly

66 (1) Every one who is a member of an unlawful assembly is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Concealment of identity

(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) [unlawful assembly] while wearing a mask or other disguise to conceal their identity without lawful excuse is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 66; 2013, c. 15, s. 3.
[annotation(s) added]

Note up: Offences related to proclamation

68. Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life who

(a) opposes, hinders or assaults, wilfully and with force, a person who begins to make or is about to begin to make or is making the proclamation referred to in section 67 so that it is not made; (b) does not peaceably disperse and depart from a place where the proclamation referred to in section 67 [reading proclamation] is made within thirty minutes after it is made; or (c) does not depart from a place within thirty minutes when he has reasonable grounds to believe that the proclamation referred to in section 67 [reading proclamation] would have been made in that place if some person had not opposed, hindered or assaulted, wilfully and with force, a person who would have made it.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 69.
[annotation(s) added]

Note up: Neglect by peace officer

69 A peace officer who receives notice that there is a riot within their jurisdiction and, without reasonable excuse, fails to take all reasonable steps to suppress the riot is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 69; 2019, c. 25, s. 11

Note up:

Draft Form of Charges

See also: Draft Form of Charges
Pre-ambles
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, between the day of , and day of , ***, at or near , , he [or she]. " OR
"THAT [accused full name] stands charged that, on or about the day of , , at or near , , he [or she]. " OR
"AND FURTHER at the same time and place aforesaid, he [or she]. "
Code Section Subject of Offence Draft Wording
65(1) rioting ". did take part in a riot contrary to section 65(1) of the Criminal Code."
65(2) concealment while rioting ". while wearing a [mask or other form of concealment] to conceal his identity, did take part in a riot contrary to section 65(2) of the Criminal Code."
66(1) unlawful assembly ". was a member of an unlawful assembly contrary to section 66(1) of the Criminal Code."
66(2) concealment of ID in unlawful assembly ". while wearing a [mask or other form of concealment] to conceal his identity, was a member of an unlawful assembly contrary to section contrary to section 66(2) of the Criminal Code."
68(a) offences re proclamation – stops proclamation ". did [oppose, hinder, or assault] wilfully and with force [name of proclaiming peace officer], a person who was beginning or about to begin to make, or was making a proclamation to disperse pursuant to s. 67, so that it was not be made contrary to section 68(a) of the Criminal Code."
68(b) offences re proclamation – not disperse ". did not peaceably disperse and depart from a place where the proclamation referred to in section 67 [reading proclamation] is made within thirty minutes after it is made contrary to section 68(b) of the Criminal Code."
68(c) offences re proclamation – not disperse after stopping proclamation ". did not depart from a place within thirty minutes when he has reasonable grounds to believe that the proclamation referred to in section 67 would have been made in that place if [he or some person] had not opposed, hindered or assaulted, wilfully and with force, [name of proclaiming peace officer] a person who would have made it contrary to section 68(c) of the Criminal Code."
69 failing to suppress riot ". being peace officer who received notice that there was a riot within their jurisdiction and, without reasonable excuse, failed to take all reasonable steps to suppress the riot contrary to section 69 of the Criminal Code."

Proof of the Offence

Proving unlawful assembly and rioting under s. 63 should include:

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. the culprit was a member of an assembly of three or more persons;
  5. there as a common intent to carry out a "common purpose";
  6. the assembly conducted themselves as to "cause persons in the neighbourhood of the assembly to fear" that they (a) "disturb the peace tumultuously" or (b) "will by that assembly needlessly and without reasonable cause provoke other persons to disturb the peace tumultuously."
  7. the fear was reasonably held; and
  8. the assembly is not "by reason only that they are assembled to protect the dwelling-house of any one of them against persons who are threatening to break and enter it for the purpose of committing an indictable offence therein".

Proving rioting under s. 65 should include:

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. the culprit was the member of "an unlawful assembly that has begun to disturb the peace tumultuously"
  5. the culprit performed the prohibited act "while wearing a mask or other disguise to conceal their identity" (aggravating factor).

Proving offences related to proclamation under s. 68 should include:

  1. identity of accused as culprit
  2. date and time of the incident
  3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
  4. the culprit either:
    1. "opposes, hinders or assaults, wilfully and with force, a person who begins to make or is about to begin to make or is making the proclamation referred to in section 67 so that it is not made;"
    2. "does not peaceably disperse and depart from a place where the proclamation referred to in section 67 is made within thirty minutes after it is made;" or
    3. "does not depart from a place within thirty minutes when he has reasonable grounds to believe that the proclamation referred to in section 67 would have been made in that place if some person had not opposed, hindered or assaulted, wilfully and with force, a person who would have made it."

    Proving neglect by peace officer under s. 69 should include:

    1. identity of accused as culprit
    2. date and time of the incident
    3. jurisdiction (incl. region and province)
    4. the culprit is a "peace officer";
    5. the culprit "receives notice that there is a riot within his jurisdiction"
    6. the culprit "fails to take all reasonable steps to suppress the riot"; and
    7. the culprit was "without reasonable excuse".

    Reading Proclamation

    Reading proclamation

    67. A person who is

    (a) a justice, mayor or sheriff, or the lawful deputy of a mayor or sheriff, (b) a warden or deputy warden of a prison, or (c) the institutional head of a penitentiary, as those expressions are defined in subsection 2(1) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, or that person’s deputy,

    who receives notice that, at any place within the jurisdiction of the person, twelve or more persons are unlawfully and riotously assembled together shall go to that place and, after approaching as near as is safe, if the person is satisfied that a riot is in progress, shall command silence and thereupon make or cause to be made in a loud voice a proclamation in the following words or to the like effect:

    Her Majesty the Queen charges and commands all persons being assembled immediately to disperse and peaceably to depart to their habitations or to their lawful business on the pain of being guilty of an offence for which, on conviction, they may be sentenced to imprisonment for life. GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.


    R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 67; 1994, c. 44, s. 5.

    Note up:

    The proclamation must be read "in the words referred to in s. 67 or in words which have the same meaning and convey the same message as the words. in s. 67." [1] The judge should not redact reference to the penalty described in the proclamation. [2]

    "Justice" and "peace officer" are defined in s. 2 of the Code.

    1. R v Thorne, 2004 NBCA 102 (CanLII), 192 CCC (3d) 424, perDeschênes JA, at para 12
    2. ↑ Thorne

    Interpretation of the Offence

    Section 65 is a general intent offence. [1] It is not a strict liability offence. [2]

    For a conviction under s. 66, the accused must be aware that the assembly was for the purpose of disturbing peace and that their conduct would cause reasonably-grounded neighbourhood to fear that they will be disturbed tumultuously. [3]

    Proof of "compliance with s. 67 is an essential ingredient of a s. 68 offence." [4]

    "Tumultuously" requires " some elements of violence or force which may be exhibited by menaces of threats." [5]

    Section 65 does not violate s. 7 or 11(d) of the Charter. [6]

    1. R v Kirkwood, 2013 BCPC 84 (CanLII), perBagnall J, at para 22
    2. R v Brien, 1993 CanLII 2842 (NWT SC), , 86 CCC (3d) 550, perde Weedt J
    3. R v Lecompte, 2000 CanLII 8782 (QC CA), 149 CCC (3d) 185, perBeauregard JA, at para 14
    4. R v Thorne, 2004 NBCA 102 (CanLII), 192 CCC (3d) 424, perDeschênes JA, at para 8
      R v Greenhow, 2004 ABCA 22 (CanLII), [2004] AJ No 38, perWittmann JA, at para 9
    5. R v Lockhart (1976), 15 NSR (2d) 512 (*no CanLII links)
      R v Berntt, 1997 CanLII 12528 (BC CA), 120 CCC (3d) 344, perBraidwood JA, at para 22
    6. Brien, supra

    Participation of Third Parties

    A witness, victim or complainant may also request publication bans (s. 486.4, 486.5) and/or a Witness Identity Non-disclosure Order (s. 486.31). See also, Publication Bans, above.

    On Finding of Guilt

    Offence(s) Victim Notice
    of Agreement
    s. 606(4.1) [SPIO]
    Victim Queried
    for Interest in Agreement
    s. 606(4.2) [5+ years]
    Victim Notice
    for Restitution
    s. 737.1
    Victim Notice
    of Impact Statement
    s. 722(2)
    s. x [x]

    Under s. 738, a judge must inquire from the Crown before sentencing whether "reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victims with an opportunity to indicate whether they are seeking restitution for their losses and damages".

    Under s. 722(2), the judge must inquire "[a]s soon as feasible" before sentencing with the Crown "if reasonable steps have been taken to provide the victim with an opportunity to prepare" a victim impact statement. This will include any person "who has suffered, or is alleged to have suffered, physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss" as a result of the offence. Individuals representing a community impacted by the crime may file a statement under s. 722.2.

    Sentencing Principles and Ranges

    Offences under s. 65 [rioting], 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation] and 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot] are straight indictable. The maximum penalty is 2 years incarceration under s. 65 and 69 or life incarceration under s. 68.

    Offences under s. 66 are straight summary conviction offences. The maximum penalty is 2 years less a day jail and/or a $5,000 fine (from Sept 19, 2019).

    These offences have no mandatory minimum penalties.

    Offence(s) Crown
    Election
    Discharge
    s. 730
    Suspended
    Sentence
    s. 731(1)(a)
    Stand-alone
    Fine
    s. 731(1)(b)
    Custody
    s. 718.3, 787
    Custody and
    Probation
    s. 731(1)(b)
    Custody and
    Fine
    s. 734
    Conditional
    Sentence (CSO)
    s. 742.1
    s. 65 [rioting], 66 , or 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot] N/A
    s. 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation] any

    For offences under 65 [rioting], 66 , or 69 [neglect by peace officer in riot], all dispositions are available. The judge may order a discharge (s. 730), suspended sentence (s. 731(1)(a)), fine (s. 731(1)(b)), custody (s. 718.3, 787), custody with probation (s. 731(1)(b)), custody with a fine (s. 734), or a conditional sentence (s. 742.1).

    Offences under s. 68 [interference or failure to comply with proclamation] are ineligible for a conditional sentence order under s. 742.1(c), when prosecuted by indictment, as the maximum period of incarceration is 14 years or life. If convicted under this offence a discharge is not available under s. 730(1) as it is "an offence for which a minimum punishment is prescribed by law or an offence punishable by imprisonment for fourteen years or for life".

    There are no statutory requirements that the sentences be consecutive.

    Principles

    The most important consideration on sentence is that of the goal of general deterrence. [1]

    1. R v Yonkman, 2005 BCSC 1842 (CanLII), perBeames J